Bernard Johns, James Hattaway, Larry Wright, Austin Beeghly, and
Present
Thomas Kunzen
Heather Stark
Absent
VARIANCES
1
2643 Hinoki Cypress Place - Request for a side street (east) setback
variance from fifteen (15) feet to eight (8) feet for a privacy fence in the
PD (Planned Development) district; BV2022-91 (Afzal Bashir, Applicant)
District 2 - Zembower (Hilary Padin, Project Manager)
Hilary Padin, Planner, presented this item as stated in the Staff Report.
Austin Beeghly asked the applicant if this is a new development and Afzal Bashir,
Applicant, was present and replied yes. Mr. Beeghly asked Mr. Bashir if he is one of
the first houses in the development or the development is already built out and the
applicant responded that his house is one of the last houses and advised that they are
building a second phase.
Jim Hattaway stated that under the Land Development Code there are six (6) criteria
for the Board to consider and the second one states that the remedy the applicant is
trying to correct, cannot be caused by the applicant. He stated that the applicant
bought the property knowing that the playground was there. Mr. Bashir responded that
he was not aware that he couldn’t put a fence in that location when he bought the
house. Mr. Hattaway asked him if during his purchase of the home, if anyone told him
that he couldn’t build a fence the way that he wants to and Mr. Bashir stated that no
one did. Mr. Beeghly asked him if he asked where he could install a fence and he said
no as he saw other homes with fences and didn’t think it would be an issue and
elaborated on his reasons for needing the fence.
Mr. Beeghly asked Ms. Padin if there have been other variances for fences in this
neighborhood and Ms. Padin responded that there have been other variances for
fences. He asked what the results were and she responded that she wasn’t sure of the
specifics. Kathy Hammel, Principal Planner, advised that she will look it up now.
Larry Wright stated that the top left corner of the survey has a curve and asked Ms.
Padin if they need to spell out something specifically so the applicant wouldn’t have to
follow the curve at the eight (8) foot variance. Ms. Padin responded that it is eight (8)
feet at the closest point.
Ms. Hammel advised the Board that there were two (2) fence variances granted in this
development last year and both of them were from fifteen (15) feet to seven (7) feet.
No one from the audience spoke in favor or opposition to this request.
A motion was made by Larry Wright, seconded by Austin Beeghly, to approve this
variance request.
Larry Wright, Austin Beeghly, and Thomas Kunzen
Bernard Johns, and James Hattaway
Aye:
Nay: