already has a home and a pool, and lastly the granting of this variance would not be in
harmony with the neighborhood, so the variance should be denied.
In rebuttal, Jeremy Avner, Applicant, responded that the first individual that they met
with was Jack Tracy, who they have text message screenshots with where he stated
that if all the permits were in place, he did not have an objection. He advised that they
have over fifty (50) signatures from the neighbors who came to his house to sign.
Chairman Hattaway asked the Applicant how they got into this situation and Mr. Avner
responded that the contractor didn’t pull the proper permits, and he came to learn that
the contractor was never a licensed contractor and there’s a big lawsuit against him.
In Board discussion, Chairman Hattaway stated that the Board typically agrees that if
they don’t have any opposition, they approve it but he’s not sure because they are
having problems with the HOA. Austin Beeghly responded that an HOA can be difficult
and that he is also considering all the addresses that they collected in the petition and
that’s what he needed to see. James Evans stated that they do have a lot of
homeowners in support and if the HOA wants to proceed on other charges, that’s on
them, but when it comes to Seminole County and the variance application, that is
separate. Larry Wright stated that nowhere in the Code states that the Board decision
is tied up with the HOA decision.
Neysa Borkert, Deputy County Attorney, advised that Mr. Wright is correct that the
County can only implement their own variance criteria and the special condition that the
land has. In this case, from the testimony that you heard it sounds like the homeowner
had an unlicensed contractor that didn’t do what he was supposed to do and he ended
up in this situation and this was not cause by the Applicant.
A motion was made by Austin Beeghly, seconded by Tom Kunzen, to approve this
variance request.
James Evans, James Hattaway, Larry Wright, Austin Beeghly, and
Thomas Kunzen
Aye:
Heather Stark, and Carmine Bravo
Absent:
15.
420A West Crystal Drive - Request for a height variance from
thirty-five (35) feet to fifty (50) feet for a utility pole in the R-1A
(Single Family Dwelling) district; BV2024-075 (Brenda Pearce,
Applicant) District 4 - Lockhart (Kathy Hammel, Project
Manager)
Kathy Hammel, Principal Planner, presented this item as stated in the Staff Report. Ms.
Hammel further explained that this site is between two (2) subdivisions, Loch Arbor
built in 1954, and Mayfair Club built in 1997 and has a small water treatment plant. The
pole meets the setbacks of the R-1A zoning classification. This variance meets all the
criteria to be approved therefore we are recommending approval of this request.
Brenda Pierce, Applicant’s Representative, was present but did not have any additional
comments for the Board.