Legislation Details

File #: 2026-0333   
Category: Variances Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 4/3/2026 Type: Board of Adjustment
On agenda: 4/27/2026 Final action:
Title: 125 Trinity Assembly Circle - Request for a front yard setback variance from ten (10) feet to seven (7) feet for a sign in the A-5 (Agriculture) district; BV2026-012 (City Church of Orlando, Applicant) District 1 - Dallari (Hilary Padin, Project Manager)
Attachments: 1. Site Plan, 2. Zoning Map, 3. Justification Statement, 4. Property Record Card, 5. Community Meeting Flyer, 6. Community Meeting Documents, 7. Photographs, 8. Sign Drawing, 9. Denial Development Order, 10. Approval Development Order
Date Action ByActionResultAction DetailsMeeting DetailsVideo
No records to display.

Title:

title

125 Trinity Assembly Circle - Request for a front yard setback variance from ten (10) feet to seven (7) feet for a sign in the A-5 (Agriculture) district; BV2026-012 (City Church of Orlando, Applicant) District 1 - Dallari (Hilary Padin, Project Manager)

end

Department/Division:

division

Development Services - Planning and Development

body

Authorized By:

Kathy Hammel

Contact/Phone Number:

Hilary Padin/407-665-7331

Motion/Recommendation:

1.                     Deny the request for a front yard setback variance from ten (10) feet to seven (7) feet for a sign in the A-5 (Agriculture) district; or

2.                     Approve the request for a front yard setback variance from ten (10) feet to seven (7) feet for a sign in the A-5 (Agriculture) district; or

3.                     Continue the request to a time and date certain.

Background:

                     The request is to bring into compliance the construction of a fifteen (15) foot tall by nine (9) foot, ten (10) inch wide monument sign for a church encroaching three (3) feet into the required ten (10) foot front yard setback.

                     The sign, which fronts S. County Road 419, was constructed in February 2026 with an approved building permit placing the sign ten (10) feet from the front property line. However, when it was constructed, it failed final inspection as it was constructed seven (7) feet from the front property line resulting in the necessity of this variance.

                     A community meeting was held on April 6, 2026. The meeting details have been included in the agenda package for your reference.

                     The request is for a variance to Section 30.13.3(a)(1)(a)(3)(dd) of the Seminole County Land Development Code, which states that the sign cannot be closer than ten (10) feet to the property line.

                     There have not been any prior variances for the subject property.

Staff Findings:

The applicant has not satisfied all six (6) criteria under Section 30.3.3.2(b) of the Seminole County Land Development Code for granting a variance as listed below:

1.                     That special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land, structure, or building involved and which are not applicable to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same zoning classification; and

2.                     That the special conditions and circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant; and

3.                     That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by Chapter 30 to other lands, buildings, or structures in the same zoning classification; and

4.                     That the literal interpretation of the provisions of Chapter 30 would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same zoning classification and would work unnecessary and undue hardship on the applicant; and

5.                     That the variance granted is the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the land, building, or structure; and

6.                     That the grant of the variance will be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of Chapter 30, will not be injurious to the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare.

Staff finds that the following variance criteria has not been satisfied:

The general intent of the Land Development Code is to maintain consistent setbacks; therefore, the grant of the variance will not be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of Chapter 30, would be injurious to the neighborhood, and otherwise detrimental to the public welfare. Section 30.3.3.2(b)(6)

Staff Conclusion:

Based upon the foregoing findings, the requested variance is not in the public interest and failure to grant the variance would not result in an unnecessary and undue hardship.

Staff Recommendation:

Based on the stated findings, staff recommends denial of the request, but if the Board of Adjustment determines that the applicant has satisfied all six (6) criteria under Section 30.3.3.2(b) of the Seminole County Land Development Code for granting a variance, staff recommends the following conditions of approval:

1.                     Any variance granted will apply only to the sign as depicted on the attached site plan; and

2.                     Any additional condition(s) deemed appropriate by the Board of Adjustment, based on information presented at the public hearing.