SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA Header Image
File #: 2025-363   
Category: Variances Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 4/3/2025 Type: Board of Adjustment
On agenda: 4/28/2025 Final action:
Title: 7400 Betty Street- Request for a: (1) A rear yard setback variance from thirty (30) feet to fifteen (15) feet for an accessory structure; and (2) A square footage variance to allow an accessory structure to exceed fifty (50) percent of the living area of the principal building, in the R-1A (Single Family Dwelling) district; BV2025-029 (Andrew Cunningham, Applicant) District 4 - Lockhart (Mary Robinson, Project Manager)
Attachments: 1. Survey, 2. Zoning map, 3. Justification Statement, 4. Property Record Card, 5. Building Elevation View, 6. Picture, 7. Letters of Support, 8. Denial Development Order, 9. Approval Development Order
Date Action ByActionResultAction DetailsMeeting DetailsVideo
No records to display.

Title:

title

7400 Betty Street- Request for a: (1) A rear yard setback variance from thirty (30) feet to fifteen (15) feet for an accessory structure; and (2) A square footage variance to allow an accessory structure to exceed fifty (50) percent of the living area of the principal building, in the R-1A (Single Family Dwelling) district; BV2025-029 (Andrew Cunningham, Applicant) District 4 - Lockhart  (Mary Robinson, Project Manager)

end

Department/Division:

division

Development Services - Planning and Development

body

Authorized By:

Kathy Hammel

Contact/Phone Number:

Mary Robinson/407-665-7339

Motion/Recommendation:

1.                     Deny the request for a: (1) A rear yard setback variance from thirty (30) feet to fifteen (15) feet for an accessory structure; and (2) A square footage area variance to allow an accessory structure to exceed fifty (50) percent of the living area of the principal building, in the R-1A (Single Family Dwelling) district or

2.                     Approve the request for a (1) A rear yard setback variance from thirty (30) feet to fifteen (15) feet for an accessory structure; and (2) A square footage area variance to allow an accessory structure to exceed fifty (50) percent of the living area of the principal building, in the R-1A (Single Family Dwelling) district; or

3.Continue the request to a time and date certain.

Background:

                     The subject property is located in the Wrenwood Third Addition subdivision and is zoned R-1A (Single-Family District).

                     The proposed accessory structure is 1,560 square feet (39’ x 40’)

                     Two letters of support have been received from Mr. William Willbanks (7312 Betty St.) and William Betty Castillo (7406 Betty Street).

                     The request is for a variance to Section 30.7.3.1 of the Seminole County Land Development Code, which states that the rear yard setback for this zoning district is thirty (30) feet.  The Applicant is requesting a fifteen (15) foot rear yard setback.

                     The second request is for a variance to Section 30.6.1(e) of the Seminole County Land Development Code, which states, that Accessory buildings shall not exceed the principal building in terms of mass, size, and height unless located in the A-1 zoning District and used for agricultural purposes such as a livestock barn or stable. Each detached accessory structure or building shall not exceed fifty (50) percent of the living area of the principal building.

                     The proposed accessory structure is 1,560 square feet. The principal building living area is 1,534 square feet and the total area of the principal is 2,091square feet.

                     Section 30.7.3.1(1) of the Seminole County Land Development Code requires any accessory building exceeding 200 square feet in size and/or twelve (12) feet in height, and any accessory dwelling unit, regardless of size, to meet all of the setback requirements applicable to the main residential structure located on the parcel.

Staff Findings:

The applicant has not satisfied all six (6) criteria under Section 30.3.3.2(b) of the Seminole County Land Development Code for granting a variance as listed below:

1.                     That special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land, structure, or building involved and which are not applicable to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same zoning classification; and

2.                     That the special conditions and circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant; and

3.                     That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by Chapter 30 to other lands, buildings, or structures in the same zoning classification; and

4.                     That the literal interpretation of the provisions of Chapter 30 would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same zoning classification and would work unnecessary and undue hardship on the applicant; and

5.                     That the variance granted is the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the land, building, or structure; and

6.                     That the grant of the variance will be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of Chapter 30, will not be injurious to the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare.

Staff finds that the following variance criteria have not been satisfied:

The area of the  proposed structure exceeds the living area of the principal structure; therefore, the variance requested is not the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the land, building, or structure. Section 30.3.3.2(b)(5)

The general intent of the Land Development Code is to maintain consistent setbacks; therefore, the grant of the variance will not be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of Chapter 30, would be injurious to the neighborhood, and otherwise detrimental to the public welfare. Section 30.3.3.2(b)(6)

Staff Conclusion:

Based upon the foregoing findings, the requested variance is not in the public interest and failure to grant the variance would not result in an unnecessary and undue hardship.

Staff Recommendation:

Based on the stated findings, staff recommends denial of the request, but if the Board of Adjustment determines that the applicant has satisfied all six (6) criteria under Section 30.3.3.2(b) of the Seminole County Land Development Code for granting a variance, staff recommends the following conditions of approval:

1.                     Any variance(s) granted will apply only to the 39’ x40’ (1,560 sq. ft.) as depicted on the attached site plan; and

2.                     Any additional condition(s) deemed appropriate by the Board of Adjustment, based on information presented at the public hearing.